Introduction of Human Types

Welcome to the next generation of personality psychology – Personotype Theory (or MPTT that stands for Mituzas PersonoType Theory). It will enable you to better understand yourself and others around you. With the help of this theory you will be able to easily orient yourself in the society and to understand various roots of psychological behaviour. You’ll learn in what areas your best potential lies and how you can develop strong personality.

Personotype heory is psychophysiological personality typology based on structure and workings of human brain. Because human brain and human facial forms (shape of the skull) have direct correlations once you’ll master visual determination of human types you’ll be able to immediately know basic psychological behavioural patterns of any person you’ll meet in your environment. Human Type Theory is extremely helpful when there is a need to understand what type of people make up best compatibility matches both for personal relationship and also even for dating or marriage. Consequently the ability to distinguish human types can help you significantly both in business and in your personal life.

Unlike traditional personality psychology MPTT distinguishes personality types by relying on solid ground – human brain. Today probably a few would disagree with idea that behaviour has direct roots in structure of brain. Though naturally cultural aspects and lifetime experiences have their role in psychology (and they produce our individual personalities), biology is fundamental cause of our behaviour that both enables potential and limits for various intellectual and psychological expressions.

Simplified it looks like this:

 

 

 

MPTT took approach by concentrating on the cause and not on effect. “Effect” is the individual personality that every human being forms during  their personal lives. “Cause” of personality is biological structures that enable such different personal expressions of personality and intellect to come into existence. Once you understand cause of your behaviour any attempts to improve it and create stronger, more integrated individual personality become much easier and more efficient.

What is personotype?

Personotype is psychological personality type that is based on structure of brain. It is determined by unique proportional size and composition of various parts of particular genotype.

Therefore human type is directly related to human genotype. Human genotype is distinct stable genetic make-up of particular individual. It includes cranial and skeletal structure and other essential non-phenotypic heridatary information. That means non-heridatary and heriditary phenotypic traits such as race (color of the skin, color of hair, height and other phenotypic variations) are excluded and are regarded in MHTT as enviromental adaptations that do not determine psychological behaviour of individual (they might sometimes play only secondary role in it). It was discovered that currently in the world indiduals of 7 different human genotypes can be found. These genotypes evolved in the course of evolution through positive genetic mutations. They were named as follows:

 

 

 

As mentioned previously human genotype directly is linked to the human type. Human type is determined by structure of brain that has direct correlation with shape of the skull. Human genotype is made out of two genders. There exist 7 personotypes of male gender and 5 personotypes of female gender. This happened because some brain types are not suited for female gender, therefore two remaining female genotypes were compensated by brains of other human types. As a result Voltaire genotype woman has Lincoln type brain and Darwin genotype woman has Plato type brain. Meanwhile Bronson, Ramses, Norton, Lincoln and Plato genotypes have both male and female variants of corresponding human types. This is how it looks in picture:

 

 

 

Every human type no matter in what country, society or race it would live displays always same core behavioural patterns. This means that for example Bronson type male from Africa has same core psychological patterns of psychology and intellectual potential like Bronson type male from Europe. The individual psychological and intellectual differences arise mainly through cultural, social differences and through individual experiences that shape individual personality.

How personotype is inherited?

Personotype is inherited based on inheritation of human genotypes. Every human being inherits his (or her) human genotype from parents. There is 50% chance to inherit human genotype directly from mother, 25% chance to inherit human genotype directly from father and 25% chance to inherit human genotype from relatives (grandfather, grandmother, grandgrandmother and so on) on the paternal side.

Inheritance of human genotype looks like this (in the example we used Voltaire type father and Darwin type mother. Same principle works for inheritance of any human genotype):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As you can see there is no mixing of genotypes involved. Genotype is inherited whole and unaltered from one of the parents (or more distant relatives).

How facial features (proportional size of separate parts of skull) are related to human brain, intellectual capacity and psychology?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

These parts of the skull have direct relation to proportional size of human brain:

  • Forehead area – size of forehead directly indicates size of frontal lobes. Frontal lobes are mainly responsible for personality control and speech (and speech related processes).
  • Nasal bone – size of nasal bone directly indicates size of inferior parietal lobule. Inferior parietal lobule is mainly responsible for set of processes that were labeled as imagination (and related processes like willpower of sympathies-antipathies).
  • Chin – size of chin directly indicates size of temporal lobes. Temporal lobes are mainly responsible for auditory and verbal memory.
  • Lower jaw and occiput – size of lower jaw is directly related to size of occiput in which occipital lobes are located. Occipital lobes are mainly responsible for visual memory and attention (and mood process).

Some parts of the skull that have no relation to human brain but contribute to overall facial appearance that helps to determine human genotype:

  • Cheekbone – bigger cheekbones contribute to flatness of face, meanwhile smaller cheekbones create pointy appearance of face.

 

 

 

 

 

 

There are two parts of the brain that do not have direct correlation to any part of the skull but are very important to psychology and intellect – Limbic system and motor and somatosensory cortexes:

  • Limbic system accomplishes various functions but for individual psychology most important function of limbic system is intuition.
  • Motor and somatosensory cortexes accomplish functions that are labeled in MHTT as work.

There are no intertype size differences of Intuition and Work (differences arise only if these features are processed in area of personality control).

What creates core psychological differences between human types?

Most psychological differences between human types arise from parts of the features that are unique to human beings and evolved in the last stages of human evolution. These are personality control (right frontal lobe), imagination (inferior parietal lobule) and separate non-intellectual processes such as visual emotions, psychological relations, psychoanalysis, communicative instincts, willpower, and sympathies-antipathies.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Every human type has one intellectual feature (that is directly related to intellectual performance) and one non-intellectual feature (that is directly not related to intellectual performance) controlled in the right frontal lobe where personality control is located.

 

 

 

 

 

 

In the left inferior parietal lobule (imagination) there occurs one non-intellectual process which determines whether particular person is extrovert or introvert. Extroverted types in that location have process of sympathies-antipathies and introverted types have separate process of willpower.

These processes determine important personality direction:

  • Types with process of sympathies-antipathies are directed towards communication. Sympathies-antipathies are expressed with movements of small muscle group in the upper cheeks (only extroverts have this active muscle group).
  • Types with process of willpower are directed towards individual activities.

Norton, Bronson and Plato types are extroverted and Voltaire, Darwin, Ramses and Lincoln types are introverted.

 

 

 

 

 

 

All types have one of the three systems of interpersonal relations: emotional, psychological and instinctive. Bronson, Norton and Ramses types have non-intellectual process of visual emotions that handles all aspects of interpersonal relations (friendships, love, hate, emotional analysis of people etc.).

 

 

Geographic spread of human types

Today exact statistics of human type demographics is still not possible to produce but it’s possible to approximately estimate pervasion of various human types and where they are most dominant.

At present moment Bronson type is absolutely most widespread human type. It is present in all societies and the large populations of east Asian countries makes it easily most populated type on earth. Universal qualities of intellect and high adaptability enabled Bronson type’s dominance on earth.

Close second widespread type is Plato type which has abilities to survive most harsh physical and psychological conditions. Plato type is mostly widespread in territories which were considered before advancement of technological age as most unsuitable for living. It includes Scandinavian peninsula, Iceland, east and north Europe, hottest spots of Africa and similar locations with bad conditions.

More comfort demanding types inhabited much more geographically ideal locations such as shores near meditarenean sea, middle east and similar therefore Ramses and Voltaire types there are extremely widespread.

Norton type populations on the other hand because of intellectually demanding current norms of society are quite rapidly disappearing.

In the future we will see continuous spreading of Darwin, Voltaire and Lincoln types.

Here is very rough map of geographic distribution of human types:

We will use photos of student groups from various countries to roughly illustrate genotypical demographics in various regions of the world. Let’s first take a look at group of chinese students:

As you can see most of the people in the photo are Bronson type individuals. Also there can be seen lesser minority of Darwin, Plato and Norton genotype persons. Such genotypical composition of population is quite typical for whole east Asia.

In the next photo you can see group of egyptian students from Cairo:

As you can see most of the students are of Ramses type. Voltaire and Bronson type people make up significant minority in this group. This is typical genotypical composition of population in middle east and North Africa.

Now we will look at types of nigerian students:

As you can see in this picture absolute majority of people are of Darwin genotype. Also there is very small minority of Bronson and Plato genotype people. It must be noted once again that Darwin genotype women are of Plato type thus they are marked with the same color as Plato men in this photo. This is once again very typical genotypical composition of subsaharan Africa. Nowhere in the world there exists such genotypical uniformity as it is in countries where “black race” is dominant. Africa together with East Asia makes up most monogenous societies in the world but the difference in Africa is that Darwin genotype is made up from two psychological types whereas in Asia dominant Bronson genotype is made up from one human type of different sexes.

Below you can see a group of finnish students. Apparently most people in the photo are of Plato genotype. Bronson and Darwin genotypes make up small minority. This photo quite nicely reflects real genotypical situation in Finland. In other scandinavian countries like Sweden and Norway situation is similar but recent immigrations quite significantly changed genotypical make-up of their societies.

In most west, eastern, southern european countries and countries that appeared in the process of european colonisation (like USA, Australia etc.) genotypical composition is much more diverse compared to scandinavian, east asian, middle eastern and african countries.

Male pattern baldness

It was discovered that natural male pattern baldness is exclusive trait of human types with medium-sized or high foreheads. In other words only Plato, Voltaire, Darwin and Lincoln type males have inborn natural male pattern baldness. Male of Bronson, Ramses and Norton types that have small forehead naturally never go bald. They have only general thinning of hair in the case of some disease or excess of DHT similarly like women of all types. Meanwhile more than half of males of Plato, Lincoln, Voltaire and Darwin types start losing their hair later after puberty.

There’s hypothesis that main function of male pattern baldness is defensive – bald head easily reveales big forehead (which can be not noticed if a person has longer hair) and that acted as a warning sign to emotional human type people with low foreheads that they are dealing with individual who has rational psychological qualities (it must be noted that large forehead is not sign of higher overall intellect, but indicates existance of psychological interpersonal processes (pscyhoanalysis and pscyhological relations in the case of Plato and Darwin types) and larger area of personality control in the frontal lobes).

Examples:
Plato type
Lincoln type 
Voltaire type 
Darwin type 

Even now bald head acts as a sign of agressiveness and danger. Many Plato, Voltaire, Lincoln and Darwin type males shave their heads (even if they are not balding) in order to get more agressive look.

Shaving heads is extremely popular between nationalist groups who call themselves “skinheads” or “neonazis”. Most of the people who belong to such groups are Plato type moderists.

 

 

 

 

 

 

In military shaving head is usually done for both sanitary and aesthetical reasons in order to make soldiers look more agressive like in the example of lincoln type soldier below:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shaving heads is especially popular between “black” darwin and plato type men. It’s done mostly for aestethical reasons.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ramses, Norton and Bronson type men usually avoid shaving completely their heads and prefer to have “buzz cut” instead when there’s need to shorten hair. The reason is simply aesthetical (completely shaven head does not look aesthetically pleasing on Ramses, Norton and Bronson men).

Large jaw is not sign of masculinity

On the internet and in some scientific circles (for example personality type theory of Helen Fischer) there exist various theories regarding masculinity, testosterone and how it relates to jaw size. Human type theory debunks any objective attempt to link jaw size with masculinity and levels of testosterone. Jaw size is genetic trait which is always constant in certain genotype. For example Lincoln type, Voltaire or Plato type man will always have smaller jaw than individual from Bronson type no matter how much testosterone that Lincoln type person can have. Even Bronson type female will always have larger jaw than a man of Lincoln or Plato type.

Let’s take for example popular Plato type actor Denzel Washington:

 

 

 

 

 

As you can see his jaw is small, but yet this actor is often titled as “very manly man”.

Now let’s take a look at the jaw of Bronson type actress Lucy Liu.

 

 

 

 

 

As you can see the same applies to women when speaking about “femininity”. She clearly has very big jaw yet this woman is not less “feminine” because of it and women with smaller jaws are not more feminine than women with larger jaws or vice versa. Size of jaw is inborn genetic trait and not measure of “femininity” or “masculinity”. It’s true that larger amounts of testosterone will have some effects on bone growth (including facial bones) and thus a person with larger quantities of testosterone can have a little bit thicker facial bones but his overall jaw size will never exceed proportional limits of his genotype.

According to human type theory one correlation is valid regarding jaw size: size of jaw directly is related to the size of occiput where visual cortex is located. You can read more about it in other articles in our website.

On the final note it can be said that “femininity” and “masculinity” are more an expression of psychological behaviour than a biological trait and also the exact definition of what is “feminine” and “masculine” changes overtime together with constant change of accepted societal values.

Types of scientists

During research it was noted by analysing list of Nobel laureates in chemistry and physics that almost all of them are either Voltaire, Darwin or Lincoln type men. Gradually it was comed to conclusion that Darwin, Lincoln and Voltaire types have different imagination type which allows more complex analysation of complex concepts and coming up with new theoretical models. This imagination type was called theoretical imagination.

Generally individuals of all human types (only Norton type is exception) are currently actively involved in science. Especially Bronson and Ramses types are extremely active but absolute majority of big contributions to scientific breakthroughs are made by Lincoln, Darwin and Voltaire type men. It must be noted that downside of theoretical imagination is disorder of imagination called schizophrenia (Schizophrenia happens to Voltaire and Darwin type men. Lincoln type men do not have imagination disorders or there is no sufficient data) therefore having theoretical imagination is not always advantage.

Ramses, Bronson and Plato types often overcomplicate science by overusing mathematics and complicated language without making big new discoveries or very significant valuebable contributions in scientific fields. It does not mean that Bronson, Plato and Ramses type scientists do not produce valuable contributions in science, but the amount of it is much smaller. On the other hand in language related fields like programming and mathematics Ramses, Bronson and Plato types perform very good because these fields require strong auditory system.

Naturally theoretical imagination itself does not guarantee that a scientist will achieve any significant scientific accomplishment or will come with valid scientific theory. Scientific work requires hard dedication, broad set of knowledge, open mind and continuuos mental fitness.

It must be noted that in East Asian countries (like Japan and China) from time to time there are notions that despite huge investments into the fields of science and education these countries still fall behind western countries in terms of scientific productivity and number of new patents (when compared to such countries like USA or UK). East asian people even sometimes called “less creative” because of this fact but this actually has nothing to do with “lack of creativity” in general population. This happened because in east Asian countries Darwin type minority has literally to carry a burden of scientific research on their shoulders because Voltaire and Lincoln types do not exist in east Asian societies.

It must be noted that without human types with theoretical imagination such rapid industrial revolution that happened in 19th and 20th centuries would have never happened.

After reading this article and viewing various photos of scientists one might question “what all these different people have in common? They all look different!”. It must be noted once again that phenotypic differences like skin color, hair color, different facial muscle tone and other such features might mislead into thinking that there’s no common features between persons of same type. But actually there is some: these people have one of the skull proportions that are categorized in human type theory as “human genotypes”. As mentioned before same skull type (also depending on gender) means same brain structure and thus same intellectual and psychological potential.